Draynor Sigs |
|
|
| Baakalor |
Unregistered

|
We cannot ban them simple because they use a sig from another site. Tell me honestly you want that kind of censorship....
Just treat those people who wish to use them exactly as they are treating us.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Laugher |
Unregistered

|
Ohi Baak. I figured you would've banned me for that post. But seriously, lets ban them.
[11:21] <Weebl> god how about we jstu do what they did with runehq sigs [11:21] <Weebl> make it so that it changes runehq to runeweb [11:21] <Weebl> and it messes it al up
>>>Baak edit: Language edited.<<<
This post has been edited by Baakalor: Nov 4 2006, 05:23 PM
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Spiderchild |
Unregistered

|
i remember a while back i tried to post a runehq dynamic picture of some sort, that showed my progress on goals, but the forum changed runehq to runeweb, so it wouldn't work. why don't we just do that to these draynor sigs mmkay?
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| daplaya46 |
Unregistered

|
guys this is getting out of hand ther just sigs with different pics
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Baakalor |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(daplaya46 @ Nov 4 2006, 10:36 AM) [snapback]77505[/snapback] .....i really dont care much sorry hehehe 
QUOTE(daplaya46 @ Nov 4 2006, 12:25 PM) [snapback]77531[/snapback] guys this is getting out of hand ther just sigs with different pics
I though you said you didn't care. Maybe you do.
Besides, we should just label them as what they are.....
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Laugher |
Unregistered

|
Good reply Baak
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Deathbyape |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(daplaya46 @ Nov 4 2006, 12:37 PM) [snapback]77537[/snapback]
Maybe you have already hurt my feelings for using a signature that was plagiarized from one that some of my friends worked hard to make. Ever think about that?
This post has been edited by Deathbyape: Nov 4 2006, 05:45 PM
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Iamanarab |
Unregistered

|
so, by using a faster way, you make yourself look like the utter moron you truely are? Take laugher's advice, leave runeweb, you said you wanted to right? why dont you go to draynor.net's irc and keep asking them when their forum is up, so you can annoy everyone there, and leave us to be happy.
EDIT: LISTEN TO DBA, how would you feel if your work, you had put hours of time into thinking how to create it, drawning backgrounds, setting up the stat retrevial code, and fixing them when they go down, or when jagex changes something, only to have it stolen by some morons who set up these sigs merely to advertise what will probably become a forum in the future. Catatifish deserves the recognition he gets from these sigs, and using a sig whos creators ripped off his must make him feel fairly bad
This post has been edited by Iamanarab: Nov 4 2006, 05:49 PM
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Makoto |
Unregistered

|
Laugher, it's time for your timeout for the flames that I've had to edit out of this thread. I don't want to see it locked except by my own doing.
The NEXT person that takes this into a tangent of "leave RW, you don't belong here" will be leaving themselves.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| 8o8thekiller |
Unregistered

|
this is getting stupid. Like I said before, the ppl who use draynor sigs aren't sending a message to the other runeweb members that we hate runeweb. We just "prefer" these sigs over the RW sig. We use these sigs because we have no graphic ability like some of these and would like a sig that would look its best. And honestly, i think the draynor sigs look better than the RW sigs.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Mysticallity |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(8o8thekiller @ Nov 4 2006, 07:54 PM) [snapback]77584[/snapback] Like I said before, the ppl who use draynor sigs aren't sending a message to the other runeweb members that we hate runeweb.
Yes. We KNOW you aren't sending a message of hating RW. The problem is the trouble attracted by that kind of innocence; other's will judge upon you. It's an intrinsic effect of... let's say promoting Protestantism within a Catholic Church.
QUOTE(8o8thekiller @ Nov 4 2006, 07:54 PM) [snapback]77584[/snapback] We just "prefer" these sigs over the RW sig. We use these sigs because we have no graphic ability like some of these and would like a sig that would look its best. And honestly, i think the draynor sigs look better than the RW sigs.
Thank you for your opinion. Would you like to suggest any improvements that can be done?
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Nawzlew |
Unregistered

|
It's not bad.
It's just weird, using another dynamic sig on another site when we already offer (a better) one.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| 8o8thekiller |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(Mysticallity @ Nov 4 2006, 12:34 PM) [snapback]77586[/snapback] Yes. We KNOW you aren't sending a message of hating RW. The problem is the trouble attracted by that kind of innocence; other's will judge upon you. It's an intrinsic effect of... let's say promoting Protestantism within a Catholic Church. Thank you for your opinion. Would you like to suggest any improvements that can be done?
First of all, the sigs with characters on it dont even have the construction skill on it. Secondly, the prayer icon is now silver instead of gold. And lastly i think the sig is too crammed. I suggest it be spread out more like the draynor ones. Also more selection of sigs won't hurt either. Those are my suggestions
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Rupert |
Unregistered

|
RuneWeb was not the first site to make dynamic signatures. There is no way Nico could steal any code from RuneWeb as all PHP code is processed server-side. We've now ruled out any theft of RuneWeb code. The stats are in the same order, just as they are on the RS hiscores, and fitted in the best way possible. RW did it in this way too, but nothing has been stolen. The fonts are completely different, except the font each skill level is written in, which is available to the public on the RuneHQ downloads page and is therefore not RuneWeb's property. Nico's signatures have gone one better and also added the player rank to the signature, which gives it more functionality over RuneWeb's sigs. The background patterns are vastly different and the idea of putting a RuneScape character on the sig isn't only RuneWeb's idea. The Draynor sigs are actually better in my opinion; the stats are more spaced out and better organized and the layout is much cleaner and more friendly to the eye.
Someone has better dynamic sigs than this site? Don't complain. They haven't stole any ideas from RuneWeb.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Cky |
Unregistered

|
Arrrgh, I feel like the only sane person left.
Okay listen up pl0x, the whole reason I started this topic was sort of a rant on the amount of people here, members of Runeweb, using the Draynor.net dynamic sigs in the forums . This sparked the idea in my head, "Hey those look like complete ripoffs of the Runeweb sigs " so it got me a little angry, you see. Making a dynamic sig isn't easy, and I doubt the Runeweb sigs were made in a day.
There in lies the problem, see when I see people here on Runeweb using the Draynor sigs here, I take it as a sign of disrespect for the Staff and the active members of Runeweb, and not just because it's another dynamic sig produced by another Runescape fansite, it's the fact that they look almost exactly like the sigs that were made by the Staff here.
So when I see that, I see the you not caring about the effort put into those sigs by the staff. Thats when I get mad, because all the Staff here does for you, is be nice, professional, and helpful. I'm sure unless you did something wrong and deserved it the staff would never do cross towards you. I am also pretty sure, that the Staff don't appreciate having they're work ripped off by another site, and when they people using that site's sig, it doesn't make them mad, it makes them dissapointed, and thats not cool.
So if you are using a dynamic sig made by Draynor.net, please think about what your doing, not just because of the disrespect I'm sure you'll get from the other members here, but the way your making the system and the staff here look, if your using Draynor sig, and other fansites/possible new members see that, they take the way the staff look for a weak looking stat, thus making us looked down upon in the fansite world, and/or losing potential members.
Just think about that.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
|
|