My Pker |
|
|
| redsox |
Unregistered

|
 is he good?
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| crayoneater |
Unregistered

|
yea he will work, i got a lvl 50 mage, pm me in game and we can pk
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Dilbert26 |
Unregistered

|
why 42 att? should be like 40 but other than that, its good. Maybe 3 more prayer lvls.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| dragon knight |
Unregistered

|
pretty good but i wouldnt have trained def though
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Crunch |
Unregistered

|
hes pretty good, but why get defence to 10?? keep training strength
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Yilin Go |
Unregistered

|
oh snap nice
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Geo1988 |
Unregistered

|
Good Pker
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| theunlucky |
Unregistered

|
nice stats
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| 8o8thekiller |
Unregistered

|
not bad.. jsut keep training strength
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| moe |
Unregistered

|
not bad...too bad he's not p2p, i've got a lvl 56 we could team him up with
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| meteora184 |
Unregistered

|
he seems to be p2p beings that he has theiving and agility
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| thorny |
Unregistered

|
start over.
42 atk = BAD, only choice is for 60/70, lotta work
1 mage? wdf? are u kidding me? mage is ESSENTIAL
2 range, get 40 at least, 70 if p2p.
the worst is 10 def. It may not seem like a lot, but IT MAKES A HUGE DIFFERENCE.
around THREE combat levels, right there.
let me get an example, I mahatma I.
88 atk, 99 str, 99 mage, 80+ range, 43 prayer (bad), TEN DEFENSE. he's currently lvl 91.
with 1 def, he would be lvl 88. there is HUGE difference in the 89-90 barrier. Not only in the duel arena, but in a lot more places, such as the castle.
let's take another pure, Volcanic Fox.
99 atk, 99 str, 80+ mage, 80+ range, ONE defense. lvl 94. He has 11 atk lvls on Mahatma, and only 3 combat lvls higher.
what would u want? 10 def? or 99 atk?
This post has been edited by thorny: Jan 18 2006, 06:20 AM
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Baakalor |
Unregistered

|
Thorny? I would be curious as to what the stats would be if you showed them for people around Redsox's level. The examples you gave are 35+ combat levels higher and at his level, appear totally unreachable. He asked if he was good. Any chance of you doing some comparisons with around the 50+ combat level?
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| daynepain |
Unregistered

|
Cool acc, i can't be bothered to make melee pure i just got my lil pure range/mage
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| thorny |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(Baakalor @ Jan 17 2006, 11:26 PM) [snapback]40573[/snapback] Thorny? I would be curious as to what the stats would be if you showed them for people around Redsox's level. The examples you gave are 35+ combat levels higher and at his level, appear totally unreachable. He asked if he was good. Any chance of you doing some comparisons with around the 50+ combat level?
i'll have u know that there is a pure i think, ummm, "whip u dead"
40 atk, 70+ str, 1 def, 60+ mage, 40 range, 51 or 52 combat.
there's also "mediuwmell" and mediumwell.
they're all ownage lvl 50s.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
|
|