My Pker |
|
|
| I R Bush |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(thorny @ Jan 18 2006, 11:07 AM) [snapback]40581[/snapback] i'll have u know that there is a pure i think, ummm, "whip u dead" 40 atk, 70+ str, 1 def, 60+ mage, 40 range, 51 or 52 combat.
there's also "mediuwmell" and mediumwell.
they're all ownage lvl 50s.
You're totally wrong. That is NOT a pure. That's just a pker. PURE fighter may NOT have magic. RSC pures > RS2 "pures".
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Jasper |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(thorny @ Jan 18 2006, 06:19 AM) [snapback]40564[/snapback] start over.
42 atk = BAD, only choice is for 60/70, lotta work
1 mage? wdf? are u kidding me? mage is ESSENTIAL
2 range, get 40 at least, 70 if p2p.
the worst is 10 def. It may not seem like a lot, but IT MAKES A HUGE DIFFERENCE.
around THREE combat levels, right there.
let me get an example, I mahatma I.
88 atk, 99 str, 99 mage, 80+ range, 43 prayer (bad), TEN DEFENSE. he's currently lvl 91.
with 1 def, he would be lvl 88. there is HUGE difference in the 89-90 barrier. Not only in the duel arena, but in a lot more places, such as the castle.
let's take another pure, Volcanic Fox.
99 atk, 99 str, 80+ mage, 80+ range, ONE defense. lvl 94. He has 11 atk lvls on Mahatma, and only 3 combat lvls higher.
what would u want? 10 def? or 99 atk?
He wouldn't look as cool as he does. Gold trimmed full black= 1337 stuff man. Good pure, just needs more work on attack, strength, mage and range. Good Luck.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| thorny |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(I R Bush @ Jan 18 2006, 07:41 AM) [snapback]40612[/snapback] You're totally wrong. That is NOT a pure. That's just a pker. PURE fighter may NOT have magic. RSC pures > RS2 "pures".
ok, let me get something straight. Pures pk, making them pkers.
in rsc, you could have characters who were lvl 13s with lvl 75 mage....
u'll never get many pks without mage, it's essential. i don't have mage, which is why most of my kills get away with teles and running.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Baakalor |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(thorny @ Jan 18 2006, 04:19 PM) [snapback]40720[/snapback] Pures pk, making them pkers.
True. However, not all pkers are pure.
Pures started out in RSC making either a mage, ranger, or meleer. Having stats in all 3 areas contributed to your combat level making you non-pure.
The example you gave of "whip u dead" having 60+ mage and 40 range is not a pure. He may be a pker, however, he is most definitely not a pure.
And yes, you are correct in that mage is pretty much essential in RS2 pking. Whether a skill is essential or not does not change the definition of a pure.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| thorny |
Unregistered

|
fien, you're right, but you NEED mage. You can't pk as a pure without mage and get many kills except from idiots and people who lag.
and what's the point of a combat pure, if ur not gonna pk with it?
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Mystik Bunny (Tentiaus) |
Unregistered

|
Thats bull you just gotta take it a bit deeper to get the killz silly thorny. My meeler suicks asse but it ownz just fine out in da big old wildy. It hits about 10, 8, 6, str pot, 12, 11 KO
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| I R Bush |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(thorny @ Jan 19 2006, 02:05 AM) [snapback]40728[/snapback] fien, you're right, but you NEED mage. You can't pk as a pure without mage and get many kills except from idiots and people who lag.
and what's the point of a combat pure, if ur not gonna pk with it?
You're wrong again. My pker with 45 att, 10 def, 80 str kills everything that moves, and when my brother's pking with me, there's no one left alive behind us.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Mystik Bunny (Tentiaus) |
Unregistered

|
oh man that ownz when i get on with my pure and give one for my little bro to use that is what rs is all about man cuz i yell blah blah and omg the game is so much better!
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| thorny |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(I R Bush @ Jan 19 2006, 10:49 AM) [snapback]40872[/snapback] You're wrong again. My pker with 45 att, 10 def, 80 str kills everything that moves, and when my brother's pking with me, there's no one left alive behind us.
roffle, my pure with 60 atk, 65+ str, 60 mage, 60 range, 1 def, would own yours anyday...
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Fatony3 |
Unregistered

|
Bush wasn't the idea of the pure that the hp was above the combat level? In which case my mini-mage is about 6 lvls pure
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| BluEz |
Unregistered

|
Yea pures did have more hp than their combat but the only way to get that in rsc was to not have mage, range, or pray in most cases so pure really applies to both.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| thorny |
Unregistered

|
i just realized, the title says "MY PKER," not my PURE
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Ghost |
Unregistered

|
You sort of messed up with prayer leave prayer at one so you have a lower combat lvl
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Dxgr8ter |
Unregistered

|
pure in rsc = no mage, no pray and range less than 1.5x combat lvl basically you were a pure if your non-mellee skills didn't affect your combat lvl.
transferring this over to rs2, you could say that ppl with mage are in fact pures in a sense because the non-mellee skill often does not affect combat lvl.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
|
|