Where To Go From Here?, (stats-wise) |
|
|
| Baakalor |
Unregistered

|
What are your recommendations for this character and why? Any constructive input (good or bad) would be appreciated. Please don't just post things like, "Those stats suck." We already know that.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Barnacleboy1 |
Unregistered

|
60 attack 70 str would be and ok start, i think you should get mage and range to 70+ too
Thanks, Barn
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Dilbert26 |
Unregistered

|
I thought def is good to get in rs2. It also depends if you want to be a low, med or high lvl char.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Makoto |
Unregistered

|
Impressive stats, yes. Raise strength to 50, attack to probably 40, and strength again to 75-80.
Wonder who's pure it is.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Shredar |
Unregistered

|
needs 40+ fishing,31+prayer,more cooking lvls, 40 attack, 60 str, 30-40 ranged so you can get soem hp lvls at least 30 def some mage for a teleport if u want to get away in wildy. pretty good stats otherwise
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| 8o8thekiller |
Unregistered

|
pure's suck in rs2... i say just raise magic and def...
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Fatony3 |
Unregistered

|
What on earth are you looking to do with that char? FYI pure mages own f2p wild up until lvl 50 or so...of course with those pure mages there also comes a high lvl range, so that's generally the best way to go for total ownage. perhaps you could get 60 5 80 and duel arena it up, with about 70-80 range for the hp. Any way you look at it the prayer was a bad idea, but now that you have it you may as well get it to 34.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Baakalor |
Unregistered

|
As it happens, that was a character that I started well before RS2 came out and I forgot about it. The prayer was a mistake as I've always buried bones and just kept doing it. I've never PKed so I had no idea what I was doing.
I don't really need the fishing or cooking or any of the supply-type skills since I can sell them to my son and he can re-sell them to this character.
Getting 60's or 70's in the combat skills is not really an option since I don't care about getting this character that high in combat. I guess I was looking for a 40 to 50 combat level. What would be considered a decent mid-level melee style PKer?
Range and mage are not an option. I would rather raise those skills on the other character than spend that much time on this one.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| 8o8thekiller |
Unregistered

|
ur char wont be any good if u dont get a skill up to 60 or something... if u dont have time i just say leave this character.. mid level pkers might once in a while pk what? maybe full addy?
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Arguous |
Unregistered

|
I used to when bored and had access to 2 computers at the same time play 2 accounts at the same time.
My lesser account I used to mine rune ess, so it didn't take any thought, just a few clicks every so often.
And it doesn't really matter if he dies when I'm not paying attention, he just wears monk robes. Lose a load of ess, so what. Annoying walking back to Varrack from Lumby, though.
He's into the 40's mining already, purely from mining ess!
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Scuba |
Unregistered

|
Depends what your making him into. Be more specific.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Dxgr8ter |
Unregistered

|
Hmm its could be a decent character apart from the prayer.
If you wanted a guy to pk I personally would start again, unless you were planning to make him a machine and bump his str up to 75+ and prayer to 31ish
If not 40 60 1 works nice
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| site |
Unregistered

|
raise attk and str. then riase prayer to 52 for smite
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Axis Of Evil |
Unregistered

|
Fshing, personally. Or just combat stats?
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Baakalor |
Unregistered

|
I want him to be just combat from here on out. I guess what I'm looking to do is experiment with pking so I don't really care if all he pk's is addy, steel, iron or whatever. I've never pked and I feel that Baakalor1, at 103 combat, is too high to experiment with. I'm not into the rewards it's just that I want to know what is so appealing about pking so I thought I'd try it....at least once or twice anyway. 
This post has been edited by Baakalor: Sep 23 2005, 11:32 PM
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
|
|