Sig Combat Errors, Post here. |
|
|
| El Wetto |
Unregistered

|
thx alot but i got the hang of it.....but i am really lvl 62
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| MaxTheDragon |
Unregistered

|
It seems that in almost every case, the sig gives a wrong combat level, when your prayer level is odd. This is because not every Prayer level is counted, but they're counted only per 2 levels. Each two levels then gives the 0,25 combat bonus, so it is indeed 0,125 per Prayer level, but the bonus only affects the combat level per 2 levels, thus adding 0,25 each time.
The sig gets it wrong because it adds the bonus per level, and thus with odd Prayer levels, it adds 0,125 too much.
Result: Combat level shown is higher than what it actually is, for those who are close to a combat level up.
It really is that simple.
This post has been edited by MaxTheDragon: Aug 7 2006, 03:29 PM
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Hitman247m |
Unregistered

|
My sig says i'm 110 combat, but i'm only 109, here are my stats:
90 Attack 89 Strength 82 Defence 71 Prayer 90 Hitpoints 92 Magic 80 Range

This post has been edited by Hitman247m: Aug 13 2006, 01:04 AM
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Mr_Krusty1 |
Unregistered

|
Read Max's post .
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Vulcan |
Unregistered

|
mmm for my first post here in quite awhile...ty for helping me come up with more accurate ranged and melee formulas for my Genie bots those who actually know me, feel free to stop by and visit me in #genie
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Geo1988 |
Unregistered

|
Attack 96 Strength 96 Defense 96 Hitpoints 98 Range 85 Prayer 81 Mage 85
Actual Combat- 120 Displayed Combat- 121
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Pyrobird |
Unregistered

|
Yeah i can account for Max. I am a 91 but sig shows me at 92 and I have 49, an odd number, pray.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Arguous |
Unregistered

|
Sig still says 98 Combat, but I just hit 99 combat at 99 ranged. Here are my stats:
76 Attack 78 Defense 92 Hitpoints 95 Magic 69 Prayer 99 Ranged 71 Strength
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| daplaya46 |
Unregistered

|
says im 60 but im really 69..=(,59 str,54 att,60 range,hp 59,,mage 39.......dont train mage much...... sum1 fix my sig im gonna diee........i think.........
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Loggy |
Unregistered

|
daplaya, you're saying the sig is 9 levels off? I doubt that.
I'll look into this other stuff.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| MaxTheDragon |
Unregistered

|
daplaya, most likely, one of your combat stats isn't in hiscores, and is therefore considered to be 1. That would explain 9 combat levels off.
Vulcan, here's my formula if you like to use it:
CODE Melee Combat Level: (Att * 0.325) + (Def * 0.25) + (Str * 0.325) + (Hit * 0.25) + (floor(Pra / 2) * 0.25) Ranger Combat Level: (floor(Ran / 2) * 0.325) + (Ran * 0.325) + (Def * 0.25) + (Hit * 0.25) + (floor(Pra / 2) * 0.25) Mage Combat Level: (floor(Mag / 2) * 0.325) + (Mag * 0.325) + (Def * 0.25) + (Hit * 0.25) + (floor(Pra / 2) * 0.25) True Combat Level: The highest of the three class combat levels.
Att = Attack Level Def = Defence Level Str = Strength Level Hit = Hitpoints Level Pra = Prayer Level Ran = Ranged Level Mag = Magic Level
Credits to: Maxwaterman, Fern1970, Helcaterian, Oblivion590 and Hans980
This formula has 99,4% accuracy. The second best known formula doesn't even go higher than 95%.
This post has been edited by MaxTheDragon: Sep 20 2006, 06:46 AM
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Baakalor |
Unregistered

|
I fixed your sig so it shows Daplaya. As for it showing you as 61 combat, that is most likely due to your attack and magic not being high enough to show in the hiscores.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| jagexgamer |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(Baakalor @ Sep 20 2006, 12:13 PM) [snapback]73596[/snapback] I fixed your sig so it shows Daplaya. As for it showing you as 61 combat, that is most likely due to your attack and magic not being high enough to show in the hiscores.
this would be correct as jagex clearly states: "You have to be in the top 1 million (for any skill) and have a minimum skill level of 30." so if ur not it the top one million you will not be in the high scores
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Master Stencil |
Unregistered

|
Hmmmmm. It's still wrong. I wonder.
Maby there could be a section where u can manually imput stats.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
| Makoto |
Unregistered

|
QUOTE(Master Stencil @ Feb 8 2007, 12:52 PM) [snapback]88334[/snapback] Hmmmmm. It's still wrong. I wonder.
Maby there could be a section where u can manually imput stats.
Wouldn't that take away from the fact that it is a dynamic signature? 
And you also have to note that no fansite has come across a 100% accurate equation.
|
|
|
| | |
 |
|
|
|